January 29, 2017 Newsletter

Vol. 8 #2 January 29, 2017

2017 Legislature

It seems as though every new session of the Iowa Legislature brings a bill that will require Iowa Prison Industries to compete with Iowa companies for furniture.  This year is no different.

House Study Bill 49 would amend Iowa Code Section 904.808 to provide that the director of the Department of Administrative Services, rather than the director of the Department of Corrections (current practice) would have the authority to release a state agency from making a purchase from Iowa Prison Industries and allow it to purchase furniture and other items from a private vendor.

“Iowa Prison Industries (IPI) provides work training to the men and women incarcerated at Iowa’s state prisons. More than 90% of offenders in state prison are scheduled to be released, and our job is to teach them how to get and keep a job once they get out. IPI programs help keep our communities safer because offenders with good job skills are less likely to commit new crimes once they are released. Ex-offenders with good job skills are also an important resource for Iowa employers, contributing to the state’s economic development. IPI is 100% self-funding and receives no government appropriations. IPI’s products and services may be purchased only by governmental agencies, school districts, non-profit groups and employees of these organizations.”

Justice Reform Consortium opposes HSB 49 and all other bills that arise each session to diminish the work of IPI.  “Idle hands are the devil’s workshop.”  Proverbs 16:27-29.  We believe that offenders in the many Iowa correctional facilities will be better prepared for release and will stay out of trouble when presented with the opportunity to learn a skill through IPI.

 Valentine’s Day at the Court

On Tuesday, February 14 (Valentine’s Day), the Iowa Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in two separate cases that should be of interest to Justice Reform Consortium readers.  At 9:00 am, the Court will hear arguments in Jacob Lee Schmidt v. State of Iowa.  Immediately following, the Court will hear oral arguments in State of Iowa v. Kelvin Plain, Sr.

The question in Schmidt v. Iowa is whether the Iowa Court of Appeals “erred in holding newly discovered exculpatory evidence (in this case the victim’s recantation) cannot be the basis for postconviction relief when an applicant claiming actual innocence was convicted following a guilty plea rather than a trial.”

The interesting timing of this case coincides with a Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) case, in which the nation’s High Court has relisted Class v. United States, 16-424  for oral arguments at a future date.  The question in Class is “whether a guilty plea inherently waives a defendant’s right to challenge the constitutionality of his statute of conviction.”

Class presents the question whether a defendant’s unconditional guilty plea waives his right to challenge the constitutionality of his statute of conviction. After U.S. Capitol Police observed petitioner Rodney Class parked illegally outside the U.S. Botanic Garden, Class made a decision almost as fraught with legal consequence as violating parking regulations on the grounds of the Capitol: He admitted having weapons in his car. Police then searched the car and found 256 rounds of ammunition and three handguns (apparently, he brought extras, in case the first two were stolen). Class challenged his prosecution as violating the Second Amendment, but later entered an unconditional guilty plea to unlawfully carrying or heavily readily accessible a firearm on capitol grounds, in violation of Washington, D.C., law. Class renewed on appeal his claim that his prosecution violated his Second Amendment rights, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held, in an unpublished opinion, that unconditionally entering a guilty plea waives the defendant’s claims of error on appeal, including constitutional claims. Class seeks to revisit that determination on appeal, arguing that some courts allow review of constitutional claims notwithstanding an unconditional guilty plea.


Amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs have been filed by the Exoneration Project, The Innocence Network and the Innocence Project of Iowa.

In State v. Plain, Plain alleges several assignments of error, including: 1) denial of his sixth amendment right to a jury panel that represents a fair cross-section of the community; 2) introduction of inadmissible hearsay evidence; 3) denial of his constitutional right to a fair trial due to prosecutor’s repeated use of the term “victim”; 4) trial court abuse of discretion in denying his motion for mistrial; and 5) trial court error in denying his request for a racial bias jury instruction.

Oral arguments are open to the public.  You may also view those oral arguments that occur within the Judicial Building via live streaming and afterwards on YouTube

Oral arguments before the Iowa Supreme Court can be viewed live on the Iowa Courts YouTube channel.

Live streaming is only available during oral arguments. Archived oral arguments from the current adjudicative term are also on the Iowa Courts YouTube channel. A calendar of arguments before the Iowa Supreme Court is posted at: http://www.iowacourts.gov/About_the_Courts/Supreme_Court/Oral_Argument_Schedule/

Please consider a generous contribution to help fund the activities of Justice Reform Consortium

I want to help Justice Reform Consortium with its goal of working toward restorative justice

Here is my contribution of $________________________________

Submit your subscription payment to:

Jean Basinger

Justice Reform Consortium

c/o Trinity United Methodist Church

P.O. Box 41005

Des Moines, IA 50311

Name: ___________________________________________________________

Address:  ________________________________________________________

City:  ____________________________State__________Zip_______________


□ I would like to be recognized for my contribution in the JRC Newsletter.

□ I think I’ll remain anonymous.  Thank you. [Default]




WILL MEET ON February 28, 2017 at 6:30 pm at

Grace United Methodist Church in Des Moines.

3700 Cottage Grove Ave, Des Moines, IA 50311

Dues are a minimum of $15 per year.  Checks may be made out to IADP and sent to:



P.O. Box 782

Des Moines, IA 50303

Those who have not attended a meeting are encouraged to join.  We ask that you include an email address with the submission of your dues.

A tax-deductible gift may be made to the “IADP Fund”, but a contribution to the “Fund” will not make you a member.  Contributions to the IADP Fund” may be sent to the same P.O. Box in Des Moines.





Legislative Advocacy Day for the Iowa Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church will be held at Wesley United Methodist Church on Tuesday, February 7.




The next Friends of Iowa Women Prisoners meeting is at noon on Tues., February 21st at Wesley United Methodist Church, 800 East 12th.


In February, we welcome members of the Iowa United Methodist Legislative Advocacy Team to share with us what’s happening at the 2017 Legislative session.


MISSION:  To bring together and inform individuals and groups concerned about women in the Iowa correctional system and to act on their behalf.



PO Box 71272, Clive, IA  50325

email:  fiwp2011@gmail.com

website:  friendsofiowawomenprisoners.org


Bring your lunch.  The place and time are consistent throughout the year.  The meetings are always held on the third Tuesday of the month, and always held from noon to 1:00 pm at Wesley United Methodist Church located at 800 East 12th Street in Des Moines.  The location is a block west of East High School.  Please contact Vi for more information.




Voices to be Heard is a support group for families and children of an incarcerated loved one. The group gathers to support and comfort those who know too well the grief that comes to those left behind when someone they love is incarcerated. The group meets on the first and third Tuesdays of the month at Wesley United Methodist Church (800 East 12th St. in Des Moines) from 5:30 – 7:00 p.m.  Potluck begins at 5:30 p.m. meeting begins at 6:00 p.m.  The group brings in speakers, performs outreach, provide support groups and leadership classes.  It is a good idea to contact Alaire Saunders ahead of time because a head count is preferred.  Contact Alaire at 515/954-0039 for more information.


Voices to be Heard has formed also in Cedar Rapids.  Please contact:  Voices to be Heard, Voices.Heard@yahoo.com. Sue Hutchins, 252 S. 22nd St., Marion, IA 52302.








9:00 AM UNTIL 1:00 PM


9:00 AM       Speaker

Rev. Lee Schott, Women at the Well Ministry, Mitchellville Women’s Facility


Rev. Schott will speak on her work with incarcerated women and also on mental health issues related to incarceration.


10:00 AM     Briefing on conversations with state legislators


10:30 AM     Proceed to State Capitol to speak with legislators


Issue priorities:  mental health, sentencing reform, and enhancing community based alternatives to incarceration.


11:30 AM     Lunch in Room 116 of the State Capitol (cost – $11.)


1:00 PM        Lobby Day ends


To register for Lobby Day, please email allen.hays@uni.edu.  Let us know if you will be eating lunch and if you need a vegetarian option. 







Justice Reform Consortium member organizations: ACLU of Iowa; American Friends Service Committee; Beacon of Life; Compassion, Peace, and Justice Taskforce, Des Moines Presbytery; Des Moines Chapter of WILPF; Friends of Iowa Women Prisoners; Iowa Annual Conference, UMC; Iowa CURE; Iowa Coalition 4 Juvenile Justice; Iowa Justice Action Network; Iowa-Nebraska Chapter of the NAACP; Iowa NOW and Des Moines NOW; Methodist Federation for Social Action; National Association of Social Workers; Plymouth Congregational Church, Board of Christian Social Action; Trinity United Methodist Church; Urban Dreams; and Voices to be Heard – Des Moines & Cedar Rapids.

This newsletter published by: Fawkes-Lee & Ryan, Public Policy Advocates http://iowappa.com/

Copyright © 2017.  You may copy, download and print the information in this newsletter provided you do so in an unaltered manner, with full copyright acknowledgement and website link.  This newsletter may also be found online in PDF format at:  http://justicereformconsortium.org/?page_id=19

Distributing this newsletter, or any part thereof, for commercial use is prohibited.

UNSUBSCRIBE INSTRUCTIONS:  Simply reply to this message with the word “Unsubscribe” in the subject box.


March 15 Newsletter

Raccoon Hunting Season Again

Several years ago, a bill was introduced in the Iowa Senate that would allow an adolescent to go raccoon hunting with a grandfather.  It passed the Senate and was sent to the Natural Resources Committee in the House.  The House NR Committee passed it out on to the floor for debate.  When the bill was brought up for debate a phenomenal event occurred.  The subject of the bill, raccoons, became doves.  Lo and behold, legislation allowing for the hunting of mourning doves emerged from the raccoon hunting bill.  The bill went back to the Senate for its approval and hit the governor’s desk within 24 hours, where he signed it into law.

The Iowa House is at it again.  It’s trying to change apples into oranges.  The first bill introduced in the Senate during the 2015 Legislative Session, Senate File 1, passed the Senate last year 31-19 and was sent to the House.  SF 1 is a bill which states:

If the lowest responsive bid received by the state for products or other purchases is from an out-of-state business and totals less than five hundred thousand dollars, and an Iowa-based business submitted a bid which is within five percent or then thousand dollars of the price of the lowest bid, whichever is less, the Iowa-based business which submitted the lowest responsive bid shall be notified and shall be allowed to match the lowest bid before a contract is awarded.

The House didn’t take up the bill last year, but the House State Government Committee brought it up recently and amended it by striking everything the Senate approved and inserting language that a “department or agency is not required to comply with” Iowa Code sections requiring “any department or agency of state government” to purchase goods manufactured by Iowa State Industries (often called “Prison Industries’).

Iowa State Industries teaches offenders within the Iowa Department of Corrections skills compatible with jobs outside the prison walls.  The IPI provides instruction and hands-on skills in areas of furniture-making, textiles and apparel, manufacturing and specialty printing.  It teaches offenders to be on-time, productive, and respectful of the workplace setting.  It’s a valuable program producing quality manufactured goods and future successful citizens upon inmate releases.

Destroying this program has often been a goal of some legislators that believe the private sector should be the sole source of goods and services provided by the IPI.  Contrary to some remarks, Prison Industries does not compete with outside sources.   “Employment of inmates in private industry shall not displace employed workers, apply to skills, crafts, or trades in which there is a local surplus of labor, or impair existing contracts for employment or services.”  Iowa Code Section 904.809(1)(d).  Diluting the program or eliminating it will do nothing positive.

Some facts about Iowa Prison Industries:

  • “Iowa Prison Industries is a self-supporting division of the Department of Corrections. Revenue from the sale of products pays for all cost of operation, including civilian salaries, offender allowances, raw materials, and equipment. No tax dollars are appropriated by the legislature.”
  • IPI helps to “develop within those inmates willing to accept and persevere in such work:
    • Positive attitudes which will enable them to eventually function as law-abiding, self-supporting members of the community;
    • Good work habits that will assist them in eventually securing and holding gainful employment outside the correctional system; and
    • To the extent feasible, marketable skills that can lead directly to gainful employment upon release from a correctional institution.”
  • IPI enables inmates to:
    • Provide or assist in providing for their dependents, thus tending to strengthen the inmates’ family ties while reducing the likelihood that inmates’ families will have to rely upon public assistance for subsistence;
    • Make restitution, as the opportunity to do so becomes available, to the victims of the offenses for which the inmates were incarcerated, so as to assist the inmates in accepting responsibility for the consequences of their acts;
    • Make it feasible to require that such inmates pay some portion of the cost of board and maintenance in a correctional institution, in a manner similar to what would be necessary if they were employed in the community; and
    • Accumulate savings so that such inmates will have funds for necessities upon their eventual return to the community.

A record roll call was taken in the House State Government Committee and SF 1, as amended, passed 12-10.  Those voting “No” included: Reps. Vicki Lensing (D-Iowa City), Deborah Berry (D-Waterloo), Dennis Cohoon (D-Burlington), Bruce Hunter (D-Des Moines), Dan Kelley (D-Newton),  Mary Mascher (D-Iowa City), Todd Prichard (D-Charles City),  Sally Stutsman (D-Riverside),  Todd Taylor (D-Cedar Rapids, and Cindy  Winckler (D-Davenport).

Legislators often receive messages to vote for this; oppose this; do or don’t amend a particular bill; etc.  They seldom receive a kind message of appreciation.  Thank them – Please!

Alice’s Restaurant – Live! At the Capitol

“You can get anything you like at Alice’s Restaurant.”

The song – Alice’s Restaurant – and later, the movie by the same name, came to life at the Iowa Capitol last week.  Arlo Guthrie, son of noted folk singer Woody Guthrie, recorded a song back in the late 1960s (over 18 minutes long) based upon an actual event. It dealt with “littering”, or as we like to call it at the Iowa Capitol, “illegal dumping.”

The satirical song is a staple of many radio stations across the country on Thanksgiving Day.  At least, it has been.  Guthrie and a friend cleaned out an old church for some friends and took the garbage to a dump.  Being Thanksgiving Day, the dump was closed.  So Guthrie, familiar with the territory, took the garbage to a common dumping ground and added the church junk to the eyesore.  Within a day, the sheriff had arrested the two and threw them in jail.

The sheriff had 27 colored photos as proof of the incident and provided them at trial.  However, the presiding judge was blind, which rendered the photos useless.  Nonetheless, Guthrie and friend were fined $50 and ordered to clean up the mess.  (The sheriff and judge play themselves in the movie.)

The whole point of the song and movie is that the crime prevented Guthrie from being drafted because he had no moral character.  He couldn’t believe it!  Littering (or illegal dumping) was cause for him to be rejected from the Army; the same Army that was – according to Guthrie – responsible for burning women, children and villages.  And he was declared not moral enough because of his crime.

House File 2385’s original intent was to enhance the penalty for littering from a simple misdemeanor to a serious misdemeanor [simple misdemeanor = Up to 30 days in jail and $625 in fines; serious misdemeanor = Up to 1 year in jail and $1875 in fines].  Also, the original bill allowed the court to order the litterbug to pay for the cost of cleaning up the litter.  But the House amended the bill by eliminating the reference to littering and making it a bill about illegal dumping.  Currently, the act of illegal dumping is punished with a civil fine of not more than $1,000.  The bill removes the punishment of the civil fine and turns it into a criminal act with the penalty being a serious misdemeanor.  On March 8, the bill was returned to the Committee, which effectively choked its chances of being enacted this year.

We’re not sure, but supposedly proof of illegal dumping would have to include: “twenty-seven eight-by-ten color glossy photographs with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one was to be used as evidence against us.”

It’s just one of those bills that seem to bring back memories of the sixties and seventies.

JRC’s Legislative Agenda for 2016

The following bills remain alive and are eligible for debate at any time from now through the end of the session:

SF 2116 – This is a synthetic drugs bill.  We’re going to see one of these bills every session as long as chemists can determine which molecule to alter/delete/add so that the ban on one specific combination of molecules provides the same unrealistic adventure as its grandfather, without being specifically banned.  JRC is “UNDECIDED” on this bill.  SF 2116 passed the Senate on Feb. 22 by a vote of 49-0

SF 2185 – This bill extends the scope of criminal trespass to include trespass that violates a “person’s expectation of privacy”.  JRC is “UNDECIDED” on this bill.  Lacking a Fiscal Note, which would provide estimates on the number of convictions expected, we believe that the number of person charged and convicted of this crime to be very minimal. It passed the Senate 50-0 on Feb. 24.

SF 2115 – JRC wrote about this bill last Jan. 31st. At the time, we referred to the bill as

 Senate Study Bill 3007.  We also mentioned this bill in the most recent newsletter, also.  The legislation will add “jailers” to the list of professions that may be the subject of a charge of “interference with official acts”.  We “OPPOSE” this measure.  It disproportionately punishes the mentally ill and intoxicated.  Despite our opposition, the bill passed out of the Senate 49-0 on the 22nd.

SF 2061 – This bill is a response to the Iowa Supreme Court case State v. Young, 863 N.W.2d 249 (2015)(Amended July 17, 2015.)  In Young, the Court held that “a misdemeanor defendant has a right to the assistance of counsel when the defendant faces the possibility of imprisonment.”  Like everyone else, JRC is “UNDECIDED” on the bill.

SF 2059 – This is the Department of Corrections’ bill for 2015.  JRC is “UNDECIDED” on this bill, also.  We should be opposed because a “Violators’ Program” is required by law.  SF 2059 passed the Senate 48-0 on Feb. 22.

HF 2401 – This bill would prohibit anyone from opening a credit card account, or using an account in the name of a minor without the consent of the minor’s parent, guardian, or legal custodian.  JRC “OPPOSES” this bill.  We might understand the penalty of a class “C” felony if the credit limit is above $10,000, but really, what minor is going to be able to acquire credit in the amount of five figures.  What is egregious about this bill is that a class “D” felony is committed if the credit limit is below $10,000.  Lumping $9,990 with $25 with the same penalty is not equity in sentencing. 

HF 2333 – This measure would change the process of how consent decrees in juvenile delinquency cases are created.  JRC is “UNDECIDED” on this bill.

The following bills have failed to make it out of a committee in both chambers and are considered dead for this year (caution – a bill may be dead, but an issue lives forever):

Senate File 84 – A bill leftover from last year, this is a version of “Ban the Box”.  JRC is declared in “SUPPORT” of the bill. 

SF 2267 – The Racial Profiling bill.  A few amendments were proffered to help acquire votes for the bill, but in the end, there just wasn’t enough support.  JRC is declared in “SUPPORT” of the bill.  According to the Des Moines Register article of March 13, 2016, Second funnel: What survived in the Iowa Legislature, by William Petroski and Brianne Pfannenstiel, Senator Janet Peterson (D-Des Moines) said “she still hopes to advance the data collection provisions of the proposal by including them in a budget bill later this session.”

HF 2309 – A bill for an act relating to controlled substances, including by modifying the penalties for controlled substances containing cocaine base, enhancing the penalties for imitation controlled substances, modifying the controlled substances listed in schedules I, III, and IV, and temporarily designating substances as controlled substances, and providing penalties.  Equalizing the disparity between crack cocaine and powder cocaine is a priority of JRC.  This bill makes an attempt to bring the threshold amount of each closer to each other, but fails in equalizing the penalties for possessing similar amounts of these two pharmacologically identical substances.  JRC “OPPOSES” this bill for several different reasons.

HF 2323A bill that would enhance the penalty for the commission of sexual misconduct with offenders and juveniles. This is one of those rare occasions in which JRC believes that the current penalty does not coincide with the crime that has been committed and “SUPPORTS” this legislation.

HF 2334 – This bill would allow certain psychologists to prescribe particular medicines under special conditions.  JRC is “UNDECIDED” on this bill.

HF 2367 – Establishes a prearrest diversion program.  The overall concept is okay, but JRC has some problems with this bill.  JRC is declared as “UNDECIDED” on this bill.

HF 2379 – A bill that requires the impoundment of a vehicle when the driver has been charged with operating while license is revoked, suspended, denied or canceled.  JRC “OPPOSES” this bill. 

SF 2289A bill that criminalizes the mistreatment of animals that are not livestock or game, and enhances penalties under certain circumstances.  JRC is registered as “UNDECIDED” on the bill because it is estimated that animal abuse crimes “will result in an estimated increase of 26 convictions annually.”  The estimated result of convictions is not significant enough for JRC to justify working against this issue.  The bill passed the Senate 32-16 on February 25.

SF 2183 – A bill extending the statute of limitations from 3 to 10 years in child endangerment cases.  Although JRC is “UNDECIDED” on this bill, we have grave concerns about extending the statute of limitations beyond 3 years, except in cases involving murder. It passed the Senate 50-0 on Feb. 23.

HF 2064 – Penalty enhancements.  This bill enhances the penalty for child endangerment when the act results in the death of a child.  JRC consistently opposes legislation that enhances penalties without empirical evidence, but this bill has more than just the “we oppose all enhanced penalties” argument. 

HF 2399This bill is an attempt to solve problems of assault in relationships.  The provisions of the bill go far beyond what is consistent with other Iowa law regarding criminal acts.  The bill also combines criminal with civil remedies, a combination that should not get started in statutory law.  JRC is “OPPOSED” to this bill.

HF 2385 – This bill makes illegal dumping a serious misdemeanor.  Currently, the act of illegal dumping is subject to a civil fine of up to $1,000.  Other provisions in this bill (determining which entity receives money from the fines) place this legislation is precarious position.  JRC “OPPOSES” this legislation for a couple of reasons.  See Alice’s Restaurant above

The following bills have passed both chambers and have been signed into law by the governor:

House File 2271 – This is a bill that pertains to identity theft.  JRC is “UNDECIDED” on the bill.  We sense there may be unintended consequences with this bill in the future, but since we can’t specifically identify those circumstances, we have to declare as being undecided.  HF 2271 passed the House 96-0 on Feb. 24.  Passed the Senate 48-0 on Feb. 28.  Signed by the governor on March 11

SF 2288 – A bill relating to the confidentiality of juvenile court records in delinquency proceedings.  JRC has declared in “SUPPORT” of this bill.  It passed the Senate 48-0 on Feb. 25.

It passed the House 97-1 on March 1.  Governor Branstad signed the bill in a ceremony in the 1st floor rotunda on Wednesday, March 9.

Find out who your legislators are here.